Reforming capital markets to build broad-based prosperity and reduce economic inequality

Decision-making power and financial gains have accrued to too few, compounding and entrenching unhealthy market concentration and economic inequality. Meanwhile, workers, communities, consumers, and regions remain undervalued and with little influence.

A clear majority of people worldwide across generations and social classes globally agree that: “The main divide in our society is between ordinary citizens and the political and economic elite.”

Source: Ipsos

Coined by Jacob Hacker, predistribution involves reforming economic systems through which wealth is created to more adequately value workers, communities, consumers, and nature, thereby resulting in a fairer distribution of risk and return across all stakeholders in society.

Delilah Rothenberg Speaks with Jahed Momand of the Ownership Economy

Predistribution is an approach to avoiding vast economic inequality from production cycles by ensuring that workers and communities who take risk and create value alongside investors and lenders are fairly compensated for these contributions. By contrast, redistribution happens after the fact. Although one would think that increasing returns to capital versus labor might be good for institutional investors, this trend is actually detrimental to the economy in the long-term, since markets become imbalanced, aggregate demand is threatened, reliance on credit increases, and mistrust in institutions erodes stability. Since large diversified investors like pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds have portfolios that are highly diversified and essentially a slice of the economy, their financial returns are exposed to these long-term risks from inequality. In this podcast, Delilah speaks with Jahed Momand of the Ownership Economy about these trends, how rapid advancements in AI and automation are likely to exacerbate risks and inequality, and how employee and community ownership models, as well as increased participation by workers, communities, and consumers in corporate governance, can help avoid such risks.
Read More

What conservatives once knew about concentrated wealth and power

Concerns about corporate concentration and political risk aren't new. In this piece, Tom Powdrill traces a striking 1947 passage from Germany's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), shaped by the trauma of Nazism, warning that monopolistic companies can "jeopardize freedom in the state" and calling for antitrust action, ownership caps, and worker codetermination. Nearly 80 years later, as ownership and control concentrate again, the CDU's postwar diagnosis reads as remarkably prescient. A short, sharp reminder that predistributive thinking has deep roots across the political spectrum.
Read More

Council for Inclusive Capitalism: Predistribution and AI Economy

In this Q&A with the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, PDI Co-Founder and Executive Director Delilah Rothenberg discusses where predistribution stands today, what it looks like when investors apply a predistribution lens, and how the concept applies to AI-driven labor disruption. Delilah unpacks the macro-financial case for treating inequality as a material risk, explains why broadening equity-linked compensation beyond corporate executives may be a stronger response to AI-driven productivity gains than Universal Basic Income or a Sovereign Wealth Fund alone, and shares where PDI sees the greatest resistance and opportunities for investors to act.
Read More